Posted 2 августа 2021, 09:47

Published 2 августа 2021, 09:47

Modified 24 декабря 2022, 22:37

Updated 24 декабря 2022, 22:37

Covid is invincible, but... Why is the general mobilization for the war against the pandemic beneficial to the elites?

2 августа 2021, 09:47
Сюжет
Pandemic
The emergence and spread of the coronavirus is an accident, of which there were three in the last century, but it never occurred to anyone to use it the way the world elites are doing it now.

The task, which is being actively introduced by world propaganda into the mass consciousness, "to defeat the covid virus" is absolutely fake, the publicist Marina Shapovalova is sure:

“The nonsense is that this task, as it were, explains the need for regular restrictive measures, despite the fact that the organizers of lockdowns themselves admit that it is impossible to solve it, announcing and predicting“ alphabetical ”waves of new strains. But billions of people on all continents demonstrate an absolute incapacity for critical perception of information about what is happening.

The goal of an organized "war on covid" is mobilization itself.

Such a state of the masses, in which "conversations in the ranks" are impossible, for they should be regarded by all conscientious citizens as incitement to dithering and going over to the side of the enemy. For which responsibility is laid "according to the laws of wartime".

How the launched "infovirus" works can be clearly seen in the disappearance of the thesis about "saving old women" and the death counter from the agenda.

The old women, following the old logic, should already be saved by vaccination. After all, it is promoted as the most effective way to avoid infections and maximize mortality. Consequently, nothing more can be done for the old women: they saved everyone who could be saved, and the hopeless have already died. Or they will die without tolerating the vaccines due to the burden of the anamnesis. Now it is impossible to insist on the previous thesis without refuting the need for vaccination. The contradiction was removed in the simplest way: the topic of old women was removed into the fog. In order not to cause seditious thoughts among the population.

The death counter on the screens of all channels also stopped working for mobilization. First, to the "cumulative result of deaths" the psyche of the average man in the street has adapted to a consistently high level of anxiety. The need for this tool has disappeared. Secondly, the daily mortality rate does not increase on average throughout the year. And the lethality still fluctuates about 2% of the number of detected infected, and this indirectly also, as it were, refutes the effectiveness of vaccination (although there are several manipulations with numbers, but why raise unnecessary doubts). Thirdly, the stability of mortality and lethality is in conflict with both the "achieved successes of the struggle" (and they must be demonstrated), and with information about the "increased lethality" of new strains. On both sides, not good for an organized campaign. The way out is the same - inconvenient information is removed from the agenda.

But "in the subject" - information about the artificial origin of the virus and the leak from the Wuhan laboratory. Geopolitically in the subject. Although the manipulation here is quite crude: for the sake of the desired effect, two meaningfully different messages are mixed, deliberately false and probable, but unproven. There may have been a leak from the laboratory where they worked with coronaviruses. Perhaps this particular virus was "released" into the world, hardly deliberately. The "proof" of the artificial origin of this virus is a shameless lie. Which is well known to those who lie. There is no such evidence, there is almost one hundred percent confidence in its naturalness, this can be verified by studying the available information. But nobody checks. On this and the calculation.

Why do you need all this? And who is behind this? Moreover, if the virus originated by itself, and was not created by hackers. Is there an unhealthy conspiracy here.

No. Because, as I have noticed more than once, the world is ruled not by a secret lodge, but by an obvious mess. From which, however, it does not follow that there are no beneficiaries of the action crap.

About two years ago I wrote: the state elites will not give up their positions due to their increasingly noticeable bankruptcy. On the contrary, having seen the danger of the growing anti-elite trend, they will move on to strengthening, multiplying and tightening their managerial functions through the "trade in threats." This was noticeable in the way they responded to threats "eternal" and "actual" even then. But the usual threats did not work, did not allow the formation of a massive demand for the escalation of statism. And then the virus turned up!..

Yes, the new virus is an accident. Nobody created it (this is still impossible at the modern level of biotechnology). There were already three such accidents in the last century. But there was no need to use them that way. And now coincidence has coincided with necessity.

No, the state elites of even the richest and most powerful countries will not be able to cope with the process they launched.

First, their declared goal of "defeating" the respiratory virus is unattainable with such a spread. The goal is deliberately false, unrealistic. As long as it plays into their hands - you can continue in the same spirit. Until the time when the unattainability of the goal becomes obvious, and the general destructive process becomes uncontrollable.

Secondly, the launched process has nothing to do with the virus. He is "about something else." So far, its results are completely unpredictable. But it is certain that no one at all will be able to organizationally cope with the element he initiates..."

Subscribe