Futurologist Sergey Pereslegin: "New fascism is marching alongside inclusive capitalism"

“When this year we celebrated Victory Day in the Great Patriotic War, on this occasion, once again, you could see a bunch of stickers with the words“ We can repeat! ”

Some were proud of these stickers, others were ashamed, others laughed and said that these people, at best, would repeat the act of sticking.

But the tragedy - a real, great human tragedy - lies in the fact that, most likely, it will have to be repeated. Whether we like it or not.

Because in reality, we are now in a threat situation of about the same magnitude that arose towards the end of the 1930s.

As you can easily remember, it was at that moment that the world practically split into three big camps, I would call it that.

The camp of socialism, in which, at that time, there was no one in particular, except for the Soviet Union, now I do not want to consider Mongolia as a separate country, this is not so important; the camp of the old capitalist powers is France, Great Britain, the United States, they are old in that they adhered to the old picture of the world, the one that emerged during the Great French Revolution, the American Revolution - that is, this is the concept of democracy, including representative democracy, rights man and some liberalism in the economy and trade. And - new countries, which now we all indiscriminately call fascist, and at that moment each of them was called completely differently.

There was Japanese militarism, German National Socialism, Japanese fascism, their versions of fascism were in Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria, Italy, in fact, the word itself appeared. That is, there were many of these countries.

And they actually claimed to be the answer to the crisis of capitalism that the First World War perfectly demonstrated.

This war led to the death of a large number of people, to the destruction of a huge number of cities, in general to strong changes in the position of property, and all this was connected exactly with what Marx once wrote about - that capitalism in any situation inevitably has war as part of the format of its existence.

And in all these romania, italy, bulgaria, hungary, japan, and so on, there was a completely different economic and political system, but they had a common thing - the primacy of the national, a sharp weakening of the religious, even in Italy, which is a Catholic country from the catholic, one had to believe in Duce, and not in God; in God it was also possible if you believed in Duce.

Accordingly, there was a sharp increase in the role of the state in managing the economy, followed by the creation of complex state-monopoly structures, state-corporate structures, the elimination of traditional forms of democracy. All this, taken together, created a rather interesting social order.

Moreover, it should be noted that by the majority of the population of these countries, the transition from classical bourgeois democracy to what Hitler, Mussolini and so on were portrayed as rather a positive fact.

Mussolini, for example, figured out how to implement land reform that hadn't been done in decades. At the very least, he somehow handed out land plots to the war veterans, at the very least somehow organized state land with a drainage system, and so on.

Yes, at the same time due to the creation of super-centralized management.

As a result, there were three orders in Europe, which I mentioned earlier: the old democratic order, the proletarian and the new capitalist order of the fascist states.

And when this happened, when specific formats of life, thinking and activity arose in these countries, it became completely clear that two Europeans cannot exist at the same time. Because their economies are subject to different laws, but at the same time are based on the same basic resources.

And there will be a war for these resources. Therefore, the war became necessary.

And we know this war, we know it as a Holy War, as a war against fascism. We had the opportunity to see what the new order is in its real existence, and not in propaganda like the 1936 Olympics in Germany - I really like it, but it is quite clear that it had nothing to do with the real order at all.

So, now let's see what is happening with us today.

And literally the following happens.

A group of very high-ranking capitalists, including the IMF leadership, Lyn Rothschild, the World Bank leadership, and a number of philosophers have raised the question of the transition to inclusive capitalism.

And when you carefully read what they write, and again, you read not written, but read reality, you suddenly see that what they offer is exactly the same ideal new order of the 1930s, only taking into account the past almost a hundred years development, moreover, mainly the development of it-technologies.

What they're saying?

They say that the national must be destroyed, and even more so, the dark religious remnants must be destroyed. Instead of nation-states, they say, big and super-large corporations should run everything.

They say these super-large corporations, the captains of the business, must ensure that all other business formats are subordinate to their interests.

Moreover, if someone objects, it must be broken in a completely cruel and quick way.

They say the coronavirus epidemic has created the conditions for this reset, and until the reset is complete, the epidemic will continue.

When it is over, there will be other epidemics.

Like normal fascist states, they rigidly demand control over the population.

Moreover, control over the population is done through electronics, through a system of digital slavery, and under medical justifications - control over the population is needed to combat the epidemic.

Pay attention, an epidemic of not very large scale, which cannot be compared not only with the plague, but also with the Spanish flu, turns out to be worthy of justification in order to violate the rights and freedoms of all seven billion people who live in the world.

But the first thing they want is a drastic change in the world's food processing system.

They require abandoning cattle, switching first to soybeans, and then to completely artificial meat grown in bioreactors. After that - giving up milk, giving up eggs, and coffee.

Natural products will cost crazy money, but even artificial ones will cost a lot of money. That is, there will be an increase in food prices in relation to salaries at times.

Attention, the question is - why all this?

The answer is extremely simple.

In every household, in every family, there is a concept of inevitable expenses. In a nutshell - it is, of course, a roof for the head, warmth, food and clothing. Something you just can't do without. You can spend more or less on it - you can eat better or worse, but you still have to spend something.

Accordingly, the definition of the middle class is that the middle class spends less than a third - indeed less than a quarter - of their real income on food.

Therefore, he has the opportunity to spend this money on travel, purchase of household appliances and so on.

But more should be spent on artificial nutrition, because the task is to destroy the middle class - with its political position, and all liberalism in the world, all democracy is the middle class, all philosophy and all science in the world is the middle class - and thus you are destroying the social basis of the only class that could question, I would say, the eternity of the created world order.

And for this it is necessary - firstly, pressure on the labor market - this is done through robotization, and secondly, a sharp rise in the price of food products".

You can listen to the full conversation with Sergey Pereslegin here.