Even stitches can't be removed without trial! How law enforcers put defendants at risk of death

Throughout the thirty-odd years of the existence of the “new” Russia, from the tribunes of power at various levels, only appeals “about the rule of law and human rights” are heard. Meanwhile, neither one nor the other in the country all these years has not been, and is not. Another example of this is the post of the well-known Moscow lawyer Dmitry Dzhulai about how domestic law enforcement officers mock their victims, regardless of whether they are guilty or innocent:

“Today my client was brought to court in a wheelchair. 10 months ago, the same judge of the district court of Moscow, who today extended house arrest to 12 months, chose this preventive measure for him. Then he could still stand on his own.

For 10 months, the investigator of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Main Internal Affairs Directorate of Moscow, in each petition for an extension of the preventive measure, indicated that he needed to prolong it in order to interrogate the accused. The last interrogation of my client was dated 28 February.

At the penultimate extension, the investigator stated that he only had to file a new charge and familiarize himself with the case materials. Naturally, for the last two months he hasn't shown a damn thing.

But my client, over the past 2 months, has been taken to the ambulance three times, of which once to the operating room, and once to the intensive care unit of cardiology.

The reason for this is the refusal of the investigator to allow visiting the doctor for procedures, dressings and removal of postoperative sutures.

All this led to inflammation of the seams, hellish pain and the need to move around in a wheelchair.

I am not a doctor and I could be wrong, but if the pus gets into the blood, it can lead to death.

The investigator replies that he cannot allow him to visit a doctor; supposedly, only the court can do this. The court has been answering for 10 months that it cannot, contact the investigator .... But the investigator allows me to visit the court to receive my complaints about the extension of the measure and allowed me to visit the elections in the fall. To the elections, that is, he can be allowed to go, but not to the doctor.

By the way, not so long ago, literally behind the wall of the judge's office in court, another accused died right in the cage in the courtroom. There, the judge also did not believe that he had health problems.

The case was initiated more than a year ago, for more than a year it has been dragged out by 8 miraculous investigators of the Main Directorate of Internal Affairs of Moscow, because we are actively resisting and do not admit guilt.

I'm just wondering - who do you need to be to forbid an elderly person to visit doctors, put him at risk of death, make him suffer just because he does not admit guilt in what he did not do?

Such a judge or investigator comes home after a hard day's work and says to his wife/husband and children: "Ha-ha-ha, and today I refused to walk the old man on the doctor's recommendation and forbade him to go to the clinic to remove the stitches."

Or: “Ha-ha-ha, count, today in my court a man asked him to be transferred from the pre-trial detention center to house arrest, because he had health problems, I refused, and he died right in my courtroom! Estimate!

Involuntarily, the Soviet film about the Nazis “17 Moments of Spring” comes to mind. There, the Gestapo carried a baby out into the cold to force his mother to testify. But this is me, by the way, I just remembered, no parallels, of course ... "

Needless to say, the reaction of readers to this post:

- Seams! Take off! It is forbidden! What is it like?! Should the patient remove his own stitches?

- But like this. Suffer until you confess, get inflammation, suppuration, sepsis, die...

- So I also sometimes think: what are they like at home in everyday life? How can you live with it? Or, taking off a mantle or uniform, do they immediately turn into a dear family man loving wives, fathers' husbands? There are no words...

- I talked in an informal setting with the judge of the Moscow City Court - they are very specific people. She, for example, is convinced that allegedly Ivan Golunov was released only because he allegedly has a lover in the leadership of the State Duma. Otherwise, ideas about the world around them break...