Posted 24 января 2022,, 14:13

Published 24 января 2022,, 14:13

Modified 24 декабря 2022,, 22:37

Updated 24 декабря 2022,, 22:37

No time to smile! The TV did not like the ostentatious friendliness of Lavrov and Blinken

No time to smile! The TV did not like the ostentatious friendliness of Lavrov and Blinken

24 января 2022, 14:13
TV propagandists believe that until America complies with the Russian ultimatum, it cannot be polite.
Сюжет
Television

Sergey Mitrofanov

The Swiss have made what TV says is the latest attempt to prevent a world war. How they did it: At the talks in Geneva, they decorated the conference tables with flowers, lilacs and orchids, symbols of peace and love. Whether this worked or not is unknown, but the intensity of the Russian ultimatum has somewhat decreased. Lavrov shook hands with Blinken, and it seems that the parties even began to discuss the return of Russian diplomatic property.

Where is the world war?

But the propagandists were not pleased with the reduction in tension, so they continued to be in their usual state of aggressive hysteria. And the lilac, they say, wilted. And Blinken's humor is not very good - he did not appreciate the joke of humor with our demands for guarantees. (*But they demonstrated a witty play on words: pancake - Blinken.) And the West is rotten. And another 40% of British women ... under (loved - ed.). That is why they sublimate in riding on men's tanks, as does the unfortunate face of the head of the British Foreign Office, Elizabeth Truss. In Vesti Nedeli, she was also called a "dropout". Since where is she up to our Lavrov, Ryabkov and Nebenzya? “Let's not compare who has more,” Lavrov once again issued his usual witty maxim.

(*I'm not imagining anything, this is the final context of the week's propaganda.)

And also "it's pretty funny for us." Biden considered Russia's ban on the use of the dollar a high price for aggression. True, in the quote given by TV, the formula for this ban does not sound, but if it were, then the Russian inhabitant would definitely rejoice. How will he be banned from using green papers? He will go to the dollar store, and he will use them there!

However, under the ban, as it turned out, the Americans mean a ban on the use of correspondent accounts in American banks. Then it will be impossible for Russian banks not to buy currency or exchange it. Some banks are already prohibited, such as AB "Russia" and SMP Bank (* explains Forbe s). But it is possible for everyone else according to the Iranian version. However, this will only happen if there is a war tomorrow. But after all, both Lavrov and TV confirm again: we are not going to attack Ukraine. “Do not attack” is clearly cheaper than “attack”.

Caribbean crisis was not so useless

Watching the events on TV and propagandists, we sometimes ask ourselves: does the tail wag the dog, or is the dog still dominant over the tail?

It would seem that over the leading talk shows - the editors of the programs, it is the dominant. Sometimes from her assistants bring the news and memes on leaflets necessary for voicing right on the air. And above them is the Politburo, whatever that means. So the "Politburo" seems to have given back a little. And Lavrov smiled at Blinken, and the head of the European Bureau of the All-Russian State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company, Anastasia Popova, said that everyone’s mood had improved, and we clearly promised the world through the mouths of high-ranking diplomats of the Foreign Ministry that no invasion of Ukraine was planned. And TV continues to frighten! I wonder if he does it on his own or at someone's behest? Mystery.

For example, Popov, having learned that Blinken is going to negotiations empty-handed, without the “written guarantees” we expected in his pocket, is surprised: “Why are we meeting with him then?” Yes, even then and politely smile? Why should we be so polite? Like in the face to him, in the face! He mocks the open dressing room of a Swiss hotel, where Deputy Minister Ryabkov is undressing. Still, what good, Ryabkov's fur coat will be stolen by unreliable people.

TV is revising the concept of the Caribbean crisis - from the complete inadequacy of the Kremlin leaders, as it was considered in the 90s, to a major political multi-move on their part - this is apparently how it is considered today. Then the Secret Soviets brought nuclear missiles to Cuba. They were exposed. The threat of World War III forced the Soviet ships to turn around. But, - TV is considered, - in return, we received a lot of things from America. They lifted the blockade from Cuba and dismantled nuclear missiles in Turkey. But since then, however, the Americans have won back a lot, the missiles have been returned to Turkey, the American bases have moved close to our borders ... Well, then we need to inflict a second Caribbean crisis.

For the first time, Khrushchev was scared, but our Putin is not scared! Lavrov at the press conference seems to be repeating the words of Louis XIV from this year's fantasy The King's Daughter: "We are not waiting for a breakthrough, but we are waiting for an answer." Akin to film-royal: “Dear daughter, you must not agree. You must obey!"

We are giving the West one last chance to agree. And then this will happen, this ... you will gasp.

Next in line is a revision of the historical significance of the "Munich Pact"

Obviously, the revision of the "Caribbean Crisis" entails a revision of the historical assessment of the "Munich Pact" of 1938. And in the world it has already begun. The wonderful film Munich, based on the novel by Richard Harris, has just been released, where the role of Neville Chamberlain, who thought about the price of European security in the same categories as modern politicians, is interpreted differently.

And actually, the "conspiracy" was not a conspiracy. Chamberlain was simply convinced that after the horrors of the First World War, it was necessary to maintain peace at any cost, even at the cost of territorial concession to Germany. But today's Foreign Ministry of the Russian Federation thinks the same way, which "is not afraid of anything, even the Americans" (Ryabkov). According to the Russian side, in order to ensure European stability, it is necessary to appoint Russia as the guarantor of European security and agree to all the points of its “ultimatum”, without throwing anything away, since our demands are not a pasta menu. Then there will be peace and order in Europe.

And if you do not give Russia a "guarantee", then expect a military and military-technical response from Russia. We have already begun negotiations with Venezuela and Nicaragua - if anything, we will shove missiles there. They called Finland and also strictly asked them not to escalate. (*Finns were surprised.) They further strengthened the borders of Belarus. Seeing all this, European and American politicians promised to think.

The same idea was voiced by the expert of the Council on International Affairs Alexei Naumov. According to him, the negotiations in Geneva ended well. If the task of NATO is to ensure the security of its members, then with Ukraine in NATO, the expert believes, it will clearly decrease. And NATO must understand this. The security of Europe is to negotiate with a strong player, i.e. with Russia.

In other words, hello to you, historical Chamberlain!

"