World's leading media lift veto on criticism of coronavirus vaccination

Increasingly, critical articles about the effectiveness and safety of mass vaccination against covid-19 appear in the central media in different parts of the world, foreign journalists from the pages of respected publications openly express skepticism about the effectiveness of vaccines and concern about the socio-economic consequences of lockdowns.

For example, the editor of the popular German newspaper Die Welt, Stefan Aust, recently published a video commentary in which he asks the feasibility and reasonableness of the restrictive measures taken by the German government throughout the pandemic, octagon reports.

“There is a certain skepticism about government measures. Last year, at that moment there were no vaccinated, but today, in terms of the number of cases of infection, everything has remained the same”, - says Aust.

“The pandemic is dangerous, but we cannot move on in the same emergency mode. Politicians are the first to succumb to unbridled panic. This could end up with people not believing them”, - says Stefan Aust, editor of Die Welt newspaper.

Recently, this respected publication, in addition to articles on the importance of vaccination and calls for adherence to precautionary measures, also publishes critical materials of its authors, in which an alternative point of view on everything that happens is a dissenting opinion.

Meanwhile, the US media slips skepticism about the line immunologist Anthony Fauci and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA - editor's note).

So, for example, on the pages of the well-known American newspaper The Wall Street Journal , an article appeared about the "dangerous message" that the US government gives to society, advising underage citizens to get the third vaccination against covid.

“The US government is promoting covid-19 booster vaccinations for adolescents aged 16-17 without relying on clinical evidence. A large study of the population of Israel, published in The New England Journal of Medicine earlier this month, showed that the risk of dying from coronavirus for people under 30 years old with two vaccinations is zero”, - is stated in the article.

In addition, the American publication accuses a number of colleges of forcibly coercing students to vaccinate with a third dose: the risk of side effects with serious health consequences after the introduction of a new dose to young people is quite high, while infection with coronavirus after receiving two doses of the vaccine, according to the study, can cause only a slight, as with a cold, malaise or not manifest itself at all.

The article also provides statistics that indicate a serious risk of heart disease in young people under 30 years old after the second dose of Pfizer or Moderna drugs, and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) policy on vaccination of young Americans harsh criticism.

The authors of the publication are particularly opposed by the obvious disregard for statistics on the part of state institutions that support the government-approved line of total vaccination of adults and children.

Further more. On the pages of The Wall Street Journal, one can also find such headlines: "On How Fauci and Collins Silence the Coronavirus Debate," "Not an Omicron Emergency".

“These and other dissenting opinions of the authors indicate a gradually growing wave of mistrust and information fatigue from the monotonous policy of support by the central media of government measures to combat the coronavirus,” concludes the octagon.

Publications in the same spirit are beginning to appear in Die Spiegel, The New York Times, Il Giornale and other publications. “Over the past two years, many of the world's media have clearly become not only a powerful instrument of political influence, but also the direct and fastest vehicle for decisions of ruling political groups, helping to convince and justify almost any government position.

Intimidation and manipulation have become part of the work of any system publication, information discrimination and the promotion of the only correct view of what is happening during the coronavirus pandemic have reached exorbitant levels.

Such a policy, according to the authors of Octagon, led to the risk of the fourth power losing its independence, and with it the respect of the audience: “Perhaps this was one of the reasons for the change in the editorial course. Whether behind this lies another double or triple game, or whether the publications are sincere in their intentions to restore their reputation, it will become known very soon".