Analyst: in the world of new capitalism, most people will become superfluous

“I am not a source of information. Everything has long ago been spelled out wherever possible.

The basic document that describes the system we are all approaching is, of course, Klaus Schwab's The Great Reboot. We know that it has already been published in Russian; Schwab himself presented it to Putin.

The fourth industrial revolution is what awaits us all.

This does not mean that humanity has entered a new horizon of technologies that will allow it to radically change, no, the industrial revolution means that humanity will have other social and social ties than those that exist now. Everywhere, in all countries. Therefore, there will be no “country” differences.

This topic is global. It is caused by the fact that there are two conditions on the planet that the planet will not be able to survive in other circumstances: the first is the crisis of the financial system, overproduction and overaccumulation of debts, and the second is environmental issues.

I know there are environmental critics. To some extent, I myself am such a critic. But the ecological problem exists and it is impossible not to notice it.

It is enough to go somewhere to the Pacific Ocean and see how much garbage is near the coast. It is enough to understand that if trailers used to fish two kilometers from the coast, but now they go a thousand nautical miles to catch, because 60 - 70% of the marine fauna has long been eaten and caught. Again, there are problems with the electric power industry and with hydrocarbons in general, with the energy sector in general. Well, the problem of the so-called Western way of life, which has become available, in principle, to everyone. This ideology was instilled in everyone for many years. Everyone wants a separate house, next to it, so that there is a typewriter, maybe two. That is, everyone wants to consume according to Western standards.

Naturally, the Earth cannot provide this load. Equality within the framework of the modern capitalist paradigm also cannot be ensured - this is a free market, wages according to work, it is impossible to do this for everyone.

And the question arises, how can we get out of this situation. And so, in fact, Klaus Schwab in this wonderful book "The Great Reset" proposes to build such ... I, of course, would not call it inclusive capitalism, what Klaus Schwab is talking about is not inclusive capitalism, but rather socio-communism.

The main provisions of the new world in which we will live: we should give up property - hence the advertising slogans that “I do not own anything and I have never been as happy as now”; a car is a car sharing, an apartment is a rent. Salary ... There will be no work, as one Western author wrote, even in good times, therefore, it will be an unconditional basic income.

In social terms, in terms of education, medicine - all this is taken over by the state, but a person must still rely on the limit of his basic income.

And thus, Klaus Schwab believes that a more inclusive world will be built - inclusive, this is generally a dirty word - but that is, a more just world with equal opportunities for all members of society. This is what we are building now ...

And, of course, this will not be possible while maintaining national borders and national states. Most likely, there will not be such a single world government, but there will be some monetary and economic zones, no more than three of them are planned. There will be only three such zones. There will be some differences within these zones, because there are sociocultural differences, well, for example, we, Europeans and Asians, Africans have sociocultural differences that will be taken into account in these groups.

This is how our new world will look like.

Why doesn't Schwab call it communism or socialism? If we recall the main position of capitalism - this is from each according to his capabilities, to each according to his needs. This scheme is, in principle, half implemented.

Each will be "according to needs" - you will be given an unconditional basic income. But from "each according to his capabilities" will not work here.

Since the majority of people in the world are now engaged in redistribution. Not in production, not in mining.

You yourself understand that now 1% of the population is ready to provide agricultural products for the remaining 99%. The extractive industry, the basis of production, also employs no more than 1% of people.

All these industries will be provided with personnel, that is, jobs, and the rest will not. Those who are now in redistribution will be replaced within the next ten years by artificial intelligence, so-called, other automation programs. Actually, these people will not be needed.

Old capitalism was associated with the exploitation of the majority by the minority, when the majority gave their labor, and the minority led and earned money.

In the new capitalism, the majority will be unemployed.

In general, if we talk from the point of view of economics and macroeconomics, people who do not bring any benefit are, in principle, superfluous. This is the weak link.

People now need to prepare to become competitive.

In any socio-economic system, a good masseuse will remain a good masseuse and will be in demand, and then her reward will consist not only in the basic income, but also in the money that she will receive for her work.

If a person is a good copywriter, good, soulful texts were always needed, and in ancient times Aristotle was held in high esteem, and in the time of Goebbels it was especially in demand, and now, as we can see, too. Therefore, if you know how to write good soulful texts, you will also be in demand. Etc. Art workers, singers, actors will be needed, is cinema really going to die? Of course it is eternal, it will never die.

You will need good plumbers, high-quality welders, and you will also need technical construction climbers.

And all the people who will be involved in ensuring the life of everyone else - let's call them conditionally "idlers" who receive an unconditional basic income - they will naturally be in demand and, probably, will live a little better than those who receive this BBD.

My personal value judgment is that the world is experiencing a catastrophe now.

I would like to preserve my national and social identity. I would not want to live in an inclusive shared world. I have a little bit of this, like every one of our people: my hut is on the edge a little. That is, I am a public person, but my hut is a little somewhere on the edge. And I would like to sometimes be alone there and not to be touched by anyone. You will have to forget about it. "

The entire video with Gennady M.'s participation can be viewed here.